Posts Tagged 'microsoft'
Microsoft
Microsoft Corporation () is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Redmond, Washington, United States that develops, manufactures, licenses, and supports a wide range of products and services related to computing. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft]
- Details
-
Category: Google
-
Published on Friday, 23 March 2007 22:15
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 8256

| Microsoft must be really desperate if they feel they need to take this step...Why not competing in a fair way???
Microsoft: Use our search and we'll pay you
Microsoft is offering to pay corporations if they get their employees
to use Live Search at work, the company confirmed on Friday....From news.com
By the way, Google still bring more accurate results...sorry Microsoft you can't always win.
|
Articles tagged
- Details
-
Category: Krosoft case
-
Published on Monday, 24 January 2005 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 7159
I know I am publishing too much news against M$ these past weeks but...this one is one more time... aheem interesting:
Full text of a letter from Microsoft, in response to coverage of companies moving from IE to Firefox and other alternative browsers. Here at InformationWeekVisiting this page http://windowsmarketplace.com/content.aspx?ctId=63 with Opera 7.54 under Linux crash my browser each 2 link clicks. But It is running fine on Firefox 1.0
Articles tagged
Read more: Microsoft Responds To IE Security Concerns
- Details
-
Category: Supporting
-
Published on Friday, 10 December 2004 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 5585
Microsoft is still saying that proprietary code is far more secure than open source....a crazy point of view
- If we follow M$ assumption: exposed code is vulnerable...
- On the other side linux code has always been exposed...
- Windows code has always been safely locked away (true for end user or developer not affiliate with M$)
The only conclusion to the point above is that Linux contains more bugs/security problems than Windows.
But in real world, this conclusion is not realistic, since all webserver, and critical application are running under a UNIX system (Google Linux, and look at the crazy uptime of the 50 first server (average uptime of the first site is 1567 days. That's over four years!!!) running in the world on Netcraft: all are Linux based)
For me it has to do with the quality of the code.
Articles tagged
Read more: Why open source code for me will always be better...
- Details
-
Category: Krosoft case
-
Published on Sunday, 23 January 2005 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 7966
 | You will for sure make a loooooooong trip with Microsoft, but do we really have to? see the bug found at mappoint.msn.com
The register is now relaying the news Here
1. Click here: http://mappoint.msn.com/DirectionsFind.aspx 2. Then change the "Address In" box to Norway 3. In the first "City" box enter: haugesund 4. Change the End "Address In" box to Norway 5. In the "City" box enter: trondheim 6. Click "Get Directions"
|
Articles tagged
Read more: Where Do You Want to Go Today?
- Details
-
Category: Krosoft case
-
Published on Monday, 08 November 2004 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 6454
Microsoft FUD by Steve Ballmer http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/execmail/ and response from Novell SUSE: http://www.suse.com/us/company/press/press_releases/archive04/response.html So lets summarize
- Bill Gates has not see that a PC may need one day more than 640Kb...
- M$ has not see the boom of internet and has waited till Netscape show them what to do... (browser)
- M$ has not see the boom of internet search engine (Google), they start MSN search...
- M$ has not see the boom of mobile mp3 player (Ipod & Itunes), they start MSN Music service...
- M$ has not seen Linux Server and High Power Computing coming (HPC
clusters), but M$ has now W2k 2003 with a media player and Internet
explorer: an insecure browser running in kernel space!!!
- M$ has not see managed code and JVM abstraction advantages (JAVA), they start .NET
- M$ has not see that a PC may belong to a familly (real multiuser)
- M$ has not see that an OS need a firewall installed as default,
the have one in SP2 (2004, 10 years after windows95) but it can be
switch off by the first worm....
Hum for the first company In world, I am asking myself what M$ is
doing with their R&D budget? correcting a huge moutain of bugs or
only buying nearly finished products from startup?
Lets face, M$ is
the first company in world not because they merit it, simply they were
at the right place at the right time.
Articles tagged
-
-
- Details
-
Category: Krosoft case
-
Published on Friday, 03 September 2004 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 8154
WinXP SP2 = security placebo? Why SP2 deserved every shred of the scrutiny
- Details
-
Category: Krosoft case
-
Published on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 7808
 |
Microsoft cool gadget, is it not time to fire some gadget designer?
No monkey has been hurt during the process...
developer developer developer (more famous as the monkey dance) |
- Details
-
Category: Krosoft case
-
Published on Wednesday, 29 December 2004 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 6574
Interesting, after 100 lines I stop reading this promotionnal articles, really good
FUD (wikipedia):
Microsoft
is hosting a discussion on Windows and Linux between its two top Linux
consultants. Martin Taylor and Bill Hilf talk about the various OS
"We believe the way to integrate software, and the way to get
software to work in a heterogeneous environment, is through promoting
open standards"
a Funny response of a slashdotter below.... so true and
more to read here
Can somebody hit Bill with a clue-by-four and ask him about
1. Samba, and why the Samba project had to reverse-engineer everything?
2. Microsoft Office, and the hoops OpenOffice.org had to jump through to reverse-engineer their document storage format?
3. NTFS, and why Linux still can't support NTFS write natively (without using a MS DLL)?
4. All the hidden system calls that Microsoft uses internally, and which came up in the anti-trust case?
shame on You M$
Read more: Pathetic (FUD) Fear Uncertainty Doubt of Microsoft
- Details
-
Category: Krosoft case
-
Published on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 5502
Additionally, we made the following concessions to tip the scales in Microsoft's favour.
- We didn't modify the model to reflect
research by the Robert Frances Group which shows that Linux needed 82%
fewer staff-resources.
- We have not included the costs of
malware; viruses, spyware, worms, keyloggers, adware etc. Every
research point we have found suggests that this cost is essentially and
predominantly a Windows platform cost, resulting in billions lost by
business every year.
- We have also not included the
substantial costs which arise when systems need to be pre-emptively
rebooted or worse, crash, resulting in unscheduled downtime. All our
research indicates that Linux rarely if ever suffers such problems and
open source platforms on the whole are extremely robust.
- Finally, because Microsoft has
claimed that introducing Linux into an environment will lead to
increased reliance on external consultants, we have tripled the amount
budgeted for such requirements on the Linux models. more HERE (PDF 2Mb)
Read more: Standard Linux was 36% lower overall TCO than Microsoft´s platforms and applications
- Details
-
Category: Krosoft case
-
Published on Saturday, 11 December 2004 00:00
-
Written by Administrator
-
Hits: 5764